There is so much toxic smoke being blown lately over gun rights by both pro and con advocates, the public is in danger of getting lung cancer. Some historical perspective on the Second Amendment is appropriate.
This item is available in full to subscribers.
To continue reading, you will need to either log in to your subscriber account, or purchase a new subscription.
If you are a current print subscriber, you can set up a free website account and connect your subscription to it by clicking here.
If you are a digital subscriber with an active, online-only subscription then you already have an account here. Just reset your password if you've not yet logged in to your account on this new site.
Otherwise, click here to view your options for subscribing.
Please log in to continue |
Editor: There is so much toxic smoke being blown lately over gun rights by both pro and con advocates, the public is in danger of getting lung cancer. Some historical perspective on the Second Amendment is appropriate.
The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting or target shooting or even the right to defend your person and property. The Founding Fathers believed these rights didn’t need to be codified, they were assumed without question to be the natural right of every citizen.
The Founding Fathers had just fought a bloody and expensive revolution against England. They realized and appreciated that without being heavily armed themselves, they would have never been able to counter King George’s tyrannical and oppressive rule over them.
The meaning and intention of “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State…,” is crystal clear. The purpose of the Second Amendment is to guarantee that We The People would be able to defend ourselves against any future tyrannical government.
And the meaning of “shall not be infringed” is also crystal clear. What part of that phrase do so many educated people not understand? This is not a rhetorical question.
If you don’t like the Second Amendment, fine. But you can’t just ignore it, reinterpret it or spin it to accomplish your political goals — that’s not how a constitution works. If you don’t like the Second Amendment, repeal it. Good luck with that.
Larry Hoffenberg
Libertarian Party Precinct Committeeman
Payson